Wednesday, March 16, 2016


the Spin Team

As the players have gathered in Indian Wells for the BNP Paribas Open, they have been asked about Maria Sharapova’s doping violation. Their comments both surprise and disappoint me as a fan of the game.  Ben Rothenberg of the New York Times wrote a piece in which he provided quotes from several players and coaches with whom he spoke on the question of what,  if any,  attention do they pay to the emails that they receive from WADA. If the quotes attributed to these athletes/coaches are true, I am appalled that professional athletes pay so little or no attention to WADA’s email on the list of prohibited substances.

“No one clicks that link,” said Jiri Fencl, a Czech coach.

I just have my vitamins, so I don’t really have to check it,” ninth ranked Petra Kvitova said. “So I’m not really reading that. To be honest, I’m also not really checking those emails,” she said. “That’s what my doctor is doing, and my agent.”

“I don’t read so much, because the only thing I take is sometimes some aspirin,” he said. “I don’t take vitamins. I take anti-inflammatories. So it’s O.K. But when I have something to do, of course I call the doctor. I know there is a list, every year you need to read it, but I don’t read so much.” Fourth-ranked Stan Wawrinka said: “I don’t read what they change on the list, because I don’t take anything. But if I have to take a medicine, I will check if it’s on the list or not, and then I will ask my doctor if it’s on the list or not. ”

While one can understand that professional athletes are often too busy to sit down and go through what is no doubt a long email with several links etc., it boggles the mind that in this day and age professional athletes will just flippantly state that they don’t read the emails from WADA or have a process to ensure that the email is read by someone on their team.

For most folks who work in certain industries where providing information to clients/customers on a timely basis is a key to success, the importance of reading emails and other correspondence cannot be overlooked.   I cannot, therefore,  understand how it is that a professional athlete whose first responsibility should be what goes in their bodies, can decide that reading an email from their governing body about what substances are prohibited is seen as a bothersome inconvenience. Ultimately, they put themselves at risk for falling afoul of the rules as Ms. Sharapova has done.

Why do these tennis players show so little interest in anti-doping? Is tennis so lax in its doping control that they feel they don’t need to even think about it? Are the consequences so small that they would risk a doping violation? Regardless of the reasons, I find their lax approach to their careers damning and irresponsible. However, tennis players are not alone in their contempt for doping controls. Fans also seem to care very little about the cleanliness of a sport that they profess to love.  A few years ago, I read an article in which the writer sought to outline why many fans are apathetic about doping in sports.  The article stated that most fans don’t really care whether their favourite team, or athlete is doping, because they watch sport to see the boundaries to which humans can push their bodies. The athletes they love become extensions of themselves and with whom they identify. Their love has very little room for critical reflection; it is why fan is the short form of “fanatic.”  I don’t buy into this argument, but the writer clearly has a point because zealous tennis fans have actually begun to question the merits of an anti-doping program in general! 

What hope can we have for tennis fans to take anti-doping seriously when, like current players, ex-players join in the chorus of disregarding its value?  This morning a tweet from Neil Harman led me to a 4-page letter from Andrea Yaeger, lauding Ms. Sharapova for her contribution to tennis and her humanitarian efforts, especially on behalf of victims of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster. Sister Yaeger is a former tennis pro who left the WTA tour to pursue life as a nun. In Sister Yaeger’s letter, she can only point to Ms. Sharapova’s contributions to tennis in very general terms. However, her most egregious turn is taking a swipe at her unnamed former colleagues (and one gets the impression current players) whom she portrays as dishonest and failing to contribute to the sport as Ms. Sharapova has done.

Why is it inconceivable that Ms. Sharapova can do well for her sport and take a banned substance?  The sad fact is that Ms. Sharapova could just as easily have been “a wonderful role model, incredibly hard working and talented player and a morally conscience person of the highest level. Society and humanity have benefited from your over decade of contributions to tennis, sports, humanitarian causes and business ventures” as Sister Yaeger points out,  and still remain fallible enough to take a drug that is listed on WADA’s prohibited list. The two things are not incompatible and therefore it does not mean that Ms. Sharapova should not be held to the very high standards Sister Yaeger believes she has not previously broken.  

Sister Yaeger is concerned that in Ms. Sharapova’s long and illustrious career she has made this one fault and therefore should be forgiven. She will be and should be treated with compassion after she accepts and serves her punishment. We can respect tennis’s anti-doping penalty AND continue to hold Ms. Sharapova in the high regard Sister Yaeger is advocating.

It is a disservice to those who have also built the WTA that they did not receive such loud and boisterous support from Sister Yaeger during their grievous moments on the Tour. Where was Sister Yaeger when Serena Williams made her “one” fault at the 2009 USO?  Did she write a letter to Serena and to the world asking everyone to forgive her?  When Serena cut her foot in 2010 after winning Wimbledon and ended up with a pulmonary embolism as a result and the rumours of doping circulated far and wide, did she reach out to Serena and say I am praying with you?  When both Williams sisters were booed and called names in their tender years at Indian Wells, did she reach out to either of these 2 American women and their family to tell them how sorry she was that they had to experience this? Yes, Sister Yaeger can choose to write letters defending an admitted doper. She has the right to do so, but please don’t think that pointing to Ms. Sharapova’s humanitarian efforts means she’s less culpable for breaking WADA’s anti-doping rules.  

We are complicated human beings who can acknowledge the good and the bad that Ms. Sharapova has committed.  

Tuesday, March 15, 2016


The Spin Team

When we first moved into this house at Blogger in 2009 we had no idea that at some point we would seek to expand. 

We never thought we would see the day when our love of this sport of tennis would see us becoming one of the most well liked blogs in tennis.  We may not have a lot of followers on social media but our page count assures us that sometimes a voice like ours is needed in tennis land. 

We wish to take this opportunity to thank our many readers, followers and of course Blogger for making the Overhead Spin relevant. We could not have done it without you.  We will continue to maintain this site and you will be able to read archived materials here, but our new home will be over at

The site is still a work in progress but we hope to finalise everything by the end of the month. 

Thanks once again for making the Overhead Spin part of your daily tennis reading. 

Monday, March 14, 2016


the Spin Team

On the day that Maria Sharapova stood on a podium in a downtown Los Angeles hotel, criticised the hotel carpeting in the midst of telling the whole world that she had been provisionally banned by the ITF as a result of a failed doping test, the image which has been built by the best PR image makers that IMG money can buy, has struck an odd and discordant note. It is clear from Maria's tweets and Facebook posts that she does not see the irony of her situation.

Her team, including her attorney, John Haggerty, have been at pains to let the world know that what occurred with Sharapova was a mistake. She had failed to click a link in an email from WADA informing her that the drug that she had been taking for 10 years was going to be placed on the list of prohibited substances as of 1 January 2016. For Sharapova then to post a tweet telling the world about reading emails from fans showing their support is ironic at best or shows the complete and total disregard she holds for rules that must only apply to others, not for herself. 

However, this should not be surprising to those of us who have followed Sharapova since that career defining win against Serena in 2004 and the ensuing fawning of her by the media. Some journalists have even turned themselves into her publicists, relating news about Sharapova's injuries and the minutia of her life. What is surprising to me is how much the media and those who considered themselves insiders with the Sharapova camp were completely caught off guard by Monday's press announcement.  One would be forgiven if one sensed a hint of betrayal from reporters who have discovered that they were not in the know. However, that has not stopped them from falling in line when it comes to reporting about this whole doping debacle.  You get the sense that the sooner it is all dealt with, the better the sport can be by doing what it does best, i.e. imitating the behaviour of an ostrich.

Sharapova has repeatedly stated how much this sport means to her.  She and her team have gone to great lengths to tell fans just how much tennis means to her. However, a cursory review of Sharapova’s career shows that she has done little to nothing to advance the sport of tennis.  

For someone who loves the sport so much, she wasted little or no time in throwing not only her colleagues under the bus, but the whole sport of tennis:

Consider for a moment those players who have not only acted as mentors to players from their own countries, whether it is in coaching, mentoring, being practice partners, to going as far as being on the forefront of changes within the sport (see Venus Williams), to sitting on the Players’ Council to effect meaningful change that benefits all players (see Clijsters, Serena, Wozniacki) to being a symbol for women in countries where the advancement of women's rights has been a long, painful and arduous journey (see China (Li Na) and India (Sania Mirza), I have to ask myself, what has Sharapova done to advance the sport of tennis? 

As far as I can see she has done little to grow the sport of tennis in her native Russia or indeed in her adopted country, the USA.  So, I am at pains to figure out just what it is about this sport that she loves so much.  Is it the fact that it affords her a reliable customer base for her candy line, or is it the fact that most, if not all of her sponsors sell high end good which are targeted to the rich folks who presumably frequent Porsche dealerships and TagHauer stores who only drink Evian water and wear Tiffany jewels? 

At the time this writing, the ITF has yet to hand down its decision but already there have been dozens of articles written stating that she should not be severely penalized.  Contrast the following articles which were written when Serena Williams cut her foot after winning Wimbledon in 2010 and when she had a dizzy spell during a doubles match at Wimbledon in 2015.

The NewYork Times stated that she needed to provide an explanation; and 
The DailyMail, never to be left out of anything vaguely akin to journalism had this to say

The above articles are the usual pieces that are written when anything remotely resembling the appearance of doping is attached to Serena Williams.  In the meantime, an athlete who has actually committed a doping violation has barely faced any backlash.  As a matter of fact, fans and journalists alike were pissed beyond belief that NIKE would abandon her in what they think is her time of need.  As more and more details have emerged as to the negligence that attended Sharapova’s decision not to click on the link in her notification emails, HEAD, her racquet sponsor has come out in support of Sharapova, stating that they are giving her the benefit of the doubt.  One wonders what will happen if the ITF/WADA decide to impose a 4 year ban on the grounds that she was grossly negligent in continuing to take a drug, for which she received adequate notice that it was about to be placed on the list of prohibited substances.  If I was a shareholder of HEAD, I would demand that the CEO resign because clearly he is not making decisions that are in the best interest of shareholders.

Today (14 March), Steve Simon, newly appointed head of the Women's Tennis Association has been quoted as stating that Ms. Sharapova made an "honest mistake".  I have written countless times about the inherent conflicts of interest that permeates tennis and I can't for the life of me figure out why the head of the WTA would think that it is his place to comment on an issue that is now outside the purview of the WTA. 

 If it is that he is siding with Ms. Sharapova's team that this was an “honest mistake”, then it stands to reason that the WTA needs to assume part of that blame. In this scenario, the only way an “honest mistake” could have been made is if the information that was being provided was not provided in a manner that is easily accessible.  Ms. Sharapova has indicated that it was difficult for her to obtain the relevant information on meldonium because (1) she did not know the name by which WADA had announced that it was a prohibited substance; (2) she did not click on the link that WADA had sent out in an email on 22 December; (3) she did not receive the 5 notifications; and (4) the WADA site is difficult to navigate.   Perhaps by the end of the day someone will point out the other excuses that have been raised as a result of this "honest mistake".  Frankly, if you look at the list of excuses/reasons, one can be forgiven for thinking that even if Ms. Sharapova had clicked on the link(s) she would not have been able to figure out that the drug she had been taking for 10 years went by another name, and we would have been in this same position once again.

Mr. Simon, you have only just assumed the head of the WTA.  There are more pressing issues on the women's Tour at this time (time to go make peace with tournament officials in Dubai and Doha for one). Surely, taking up the mantle for someone who has the money and the connections to defend herself is outside your purview and by extension outside the purview of the WTA?  This is even worse than the talking points that the Tour has issued to players regarding this incident.

There have been strenuous requests by persons associated with Ms. Sharapova as well as members of the press who have asked that we should wait until all the facts are known before casting judgment.  However, it is quite hard for us tennis fans and those of us who truly love this sport to think that both Mr. Simon and the Chief Executive Officer of HEAD are both privy to information unknown to the rest of us which makes them take the position that this doping offence by Ms. Sharapova is an honest mistake.  If that is the case then there is no need for us to have a hearing and we can just continue merrily on our way 
As the days pass and we learn more and more about mildronate (meldonium), some players are speaking out and speaking out in a voice that will not be silenced. Andy Murray, so called champion of feminist causes had this to say about the issue.

"If you take a prescription drug[s] that you don't need but just because it is legal is wrong. You are just doing it for the performance-enhancing benefits," [emphasis mine]

Kiki Mladenovic, a French player also had some strong views on the whole situation. Her response to questions posed to her by what I presume is a French journalist (Yellow Ball Corner) are printed below in its entirety (via YellowBallCorner)

"What's your reaction concerning Maria Sharapova failed drug test?

 She doesn't even deserve any comment... As far as I'm concerned if I take a doliprane I think ten times about it before, so thinking she took a serious drug for ten years and hearing some saying she's not even sick... She has played with the rules, saying : it's not on the list so I'm gonna take it. It's disappointing and I don't like this mentality of trying to be the best by playing with the rules. That's low. She can play with the words, get good lawyers but in the principle she's totally wrong and all the players think the same thing, even the top players. And anyway many are not that surprised, due to her daily attitude : she wasn't liked.

Are you now doubting all your rivals? 

No, cause that's the big positive news inside all this drama: it proves the anti doping program is extremely efficient and that even the best players, if it doesn't go as it should it gets out.

Would you be shocked if she wasn't receiving a heaving sanction?

That's obvious she must be punished. That's very serious, and it's lasting since ten years: who does she think we are ! When you see the efforts we do to improve our endurance, our recovery, to deal with our emotions and the stress. When you're stronger physically, you're also stronger mentally. So here you wonder if the girl has done those efforts, and if she did she hasn't suffered like us, she did it easily. So you start to think she's not a champion : she cheated. Even if it wasn't forbidden before : it's the principle. Of course you doubt and you think that she hasn't deserved all that she won and did. It's dreadful, but it's good that it's finally out. I respected her for her career, but not for the person that she is because she wasn't polite nor nice, let's be honest. So with what's happening now, there won't remain a lot of people to like her... I'm a bit harsh... But we all think and say here that she's a cheater. She has no excuse, no defense. For me the debate is close and there's no doubt." 

 During her press conference, Sharapova was at pains to let us know that for the 10 years that she has been taking this medicine (note the use of the word medicine and not drug) it was perfectly legal to do so.  While that is indeed the case, the fact of the matter is that the various illnesses for which Sharapova was being treated could have been treated with other drugs. Frankly speaking, if I am taking a drug for 10 years and the symptoms of my disease keeps coming back then I am definitely going to get a second or third opinion. 

But enough of whether Sharapova knew or did not know that her medicine had been placed on WADA's list of prohibited substances, let us look at what has happened since Monday's announcement.  

The media blitz by the Sharapova team continues merrily along with a Facebook posting by Ms. Sharapova to her fans attempting to set the record straight regarding the number of notifications that she received regarding meldonium.  Frankly, it doesn't even matter how many notices she received.  The fact remains that as of 1 January 2016 she was in violation of the doping rules and therefore she needs to face the consequences of this.  In her message to fans, Ms. Sharapova took the opportunity to castigate her colleagues and the sport itself by stating that unlike others, she did not cite an injury as the reason behind a doping violation.  She is, therefore, to be commended for her honesty and bravery. 

 On the eve of Ms. Sharapova's letter to her fans, a former French minister for Sports (Mlle Bachelot) came out and implied that Rafael Nadal had been hit with a doping violation in 2012 and that his knee injury was fake.  Of course, tennis fans, not averse to playing connect the dots are of the view that Ms. Sharapova's comment about not citing an injury for a doping violation was a dig at Nadal. 

It is time for us to let the ITF and WADA do its job.  It is either the case that tennis needs to continue to play ostrich with anti doping or we just decide that it is going to be a free for all and everyone can do whatever it is that they like.  As a long time fan of the sport, I am appalled at the comments from people who should know better.  It would seem as if tennis fans prefer their sport to remain the way it is, surrounded by rumours and inneundo.  God forbid that anyone should try and uncover the darkness within.  If anyone does, we will no doubt become like cycling where we deny and deny and deny until the evidence stares us in the face and we can deny no more. 

Next week we will look at the views expressed by various tennis players regarding anti-doping efforts.  Let us just say that the Spin Team is disappointed. 

Wednesday, March 9, 2016


by The Spin Team

For years I ignored the BNP Paribas Open (aka Indian Wells).  I ignored it because neither of my faves played this event.  This changed in 2015 when Serena Williams decided to return to Indian Wells.  While she eventually had to withdraw from the tournament due to injury, it was one of those moments that will be etched in the minds of fans for years to come. 

This year, Serena's big sister, Venus has decided to return to the desert and in a piece in the Players Tribune  she has outlined her reasons for returning to an event that has not only held great memories for her and her family, but also experienced one of the worst moments in her career.  Like many of you, I can't wait to see her name on the schedule of play as I am sure that she will receive a thunderous welcome along the same lines as greeted Serena's return last year. 

It is normally the case that the month after the Australian Open is usually filled with ennui.  The lesser lights of both Tours usually take the opportunity to either make some money (Dubai/Doha) or earn some valuable ranking points (and possibly a title) (Acapulco/Monterey/Kuala Lumpur).   This year is no different. 

The top women have been either resting or in some cases took the money and ran (Dubai) or just failed to post at the starting block (Doha).  

Indian Wells is usually the start of the most gruelling part of the season.  Back to back Premier Mandatory events and then it is on to the clay for the lead up to the second Slam of the season, the French Open.  There are 5 players who are in need of a good result during this Indian Wells/Miami events.  They are: 

  • Simona Halep – She has a title in Indian Wells and a semifinalist result in Miami to defend. Her start has been difficult to comprehend. She hired Darren Cahill as her coach, decided to have nasal surgery, cancelled her nasal surgery to play Fed Cup and the Middle East swing. Her record is 3-5. A few of her losses are head scratchers. She lost to Shuai Zhang in Dubai and Elena Vesnina after leading by a set and double break, twice. 
  • Petra Kvitova – Coachless after splitting with longtime coach David Kotyza, Kvitova is currently at her inconsistent best, which usually means that she will probably walk away with either the Indian Wells or Miami title.  
  • Caroline Wozniacki - She is normally a slow starter but this year there is cause for concern. Her losses this year have been to Sloane Stephens, Yulia Putintseva, Dominika Cibulkova, Vesnina and Heather Watson. Her ranking is on the downside of 20.  Her last big tournament win was at Indian Wells in 2011.  
  • Timea Bacsinszky – Last season Bacsinszky came back from injury and announced herself as a serious contender by winning back to back titles in Mexico.  She made the semifinals of the French Open where she took a set off the eventual champion Serena Williams.  Since then Bacsinszky has all but faded from the consciousness of tennis fans.  After finishing near the Top 10, her ranking has plummeted to 21 as her record is 3-6. Last year, she won the Queen of Mexico crown winning Acapulco and Monterrey. She could not defend those titles as she is subject to the Roadmap by being at the top as Venus Williams took the veteran exception and Flavia Pennetta retired.
  • Sloane Stephens – I never thought I would ever type this but Sloane Stephens has more titles this year than many players in the top 10.  She has won two titles so far this year but both have been on the International along with her maiden title in 2015. Can she continue to produce success on the Premier level?  Sloane has not really performed well in the big events (first round at the Australian Open) but she is in her backyard now so it remains to be seen how she plays on a big stage. 

The draw for this year's Indian Wells tournament can be found here.  There will be no WTA Draw Challenge for Indian Wells as noted by the WTA Insider.  We can only hope that the Draw Challenge will return during the clay season.  

Tuesday, March 8, 2016


by The Spin Team

She took the tennis world by storm in 2004 defeating the reigning bad girl of tennis Serena Williams in 2004 to win her first Grand Slam title.  She would follow up that victory at the Year End Championship by outlasting Serena in a 3 set battle.  Her name:  Maria Sharapova.  After her victory at Wimbledon she became tennis’ marketing dream.  Tall, blonde, and blue eyed.  She would pick up where another Russian, Anna Kournikova, had left off but only better.  This tall blonde actually won singles titles.

A fierce competitor, Sharapova would become the player that tennis fans love to hate to love.  A conundrum for most tennis fans and media types.  She was unapologetic about her game, herself, her shrieks of delight, her howls of protest.  There were calls to ban her.  Calls to have her matches shoved onto outside courts. As she once said in a press conference “no one of importance has told me to stop shrieking”.

Sharapova has called a press conference for 3:00 p.m. EST, (12 p.m. PST). No one knows the reason behind the media conference, but speculation is rife that this could be an announcement of a retirement from the game.

In 2007 Sharapova suffered what would then be her most shocking defeat at a Grand Slam.  She lost 1 & 2 to Serena Williams at the Australian Open.  At the time it was opined that she was suffering from shoulder issues which affected her serve.  In Miami of that same year she was again beaten by Serena 1 & 1.  The issue regarding her shoulder was again discussed.  After a dismal 2007 season, Sharapova, as she has done so many times in her career came back to win the Australian Open in 2008, beating Ana Ivanovic in straight sets.  That match was the turning point in what became a long and arduous journey back to the top of the game.  After losing to Serena in Charleston that year, Sharapova took some time off to have surgery on a torn rotator cuff.  She would be out of the game for an extended period of time, returning in early 2009.  Her serve, while not as potent as Serena’s was a weapon that could be used to get her out of trouble.

Her matches were a train wreck, but despite that, Sharapova would step up to the line and with grit and determination win matches she should have lost and lost matches she should have won.  She persevered.  She battled.  She overcame and in 2012, 4 years after her last Grand Slam win, Sharapova won on a surface on which she described herself as a “cow on ice” by winning the French Open.  It was a comeback to for the ages. 

The serve was still a liability under tough conditions but no one ever doubted the desire of one of the world’s richest woman in terms of her ability to fight when the chips are down and her ability to stay in the moment regardless of the score line. Her biggest rival once said “I never count her out.  She won that one game and you could see her pumping her fist”. 

Sharapova’s mental efforts are legendary and while some will say that if she was so mentally tough how come she hasn’t figured out Serena, well then, the same could be said of the rivalry between Federer and Nadal.  Despite having a losing head to head against Nadal, Federer always answered the bell when it came time to meet.  In terms of Serena, Sharapova always answered the bell and always came out thinking she had a chance.  

Sharapova’s habits have been adopted by many players.  Her slow walk to the back of the court, the brushing away of the wisps of hair, the look to her opponent, deep breaths and the steady bounce bounce of the ball before serving were her ways of getting herself mentally prepared.  I for one have always admired one aspect of Sharapova’s game and that was her ability to hit the ball as hard and as flat as she did, finding the lines at every given opportunity and never missing.  The small curled fist at her side and the slapping of her thighs to get herself into a match were always signs that she was engaged. Her comments after a loss were always complimentary towards an opponent but also reflective of the reasons for a loss.

She was tennis’ bad girl.  She wore that like a badge of honour.  Which other player on the WTA would call out Serena Williams for having an affair with a married man?  Which other player would show absolutely no hesitation in speaking about the fact that she was not interested in having friends on Tour?  Was she given a pass by the tennis media? Of course she was.  Is she beloved by tennis fans?  I don’t think Sharapova would care one way or another whether fans loved her or not.  After all, this is the same player who stood her ground on Court Phillipe Chartrier and told tennis fans “Allez up your fucking ass”. 

If today is her goodbye, as a fan of the women’s game and an admirer of Sharapova, I have to say that she will be missed.  She has been a stalwart of the Tour for many years and I am hopeful that if she leaves the Tour that she will make herself available to the Tour as an ambassador for young girls not only in her native Russia but worldwide.

So that sound you hear is my pen screeching to a halt and me hitting CTR+END+DELETE to delete everything that I said above. 

I hate flu season.  I really do.  I hate flu season because there are so many drugs that I am prohibited from taking because I not only suffer from hypertension and am on medication but I also suffer from sleep apnea.  As a result I can't take medication that induces drowsiness (there goes my Vicks Nyquil) and I can't take anything that has aspirin because it will spike my blood pressure.  As a result whenever I have the flu I either have to ride it out with home made remedies or I have to get my doctor to prescribe something that will not raise my blood pressure or will not knock me out to the point that if I have a sleep apnea attack I die in my sleep.  That is just for me personally. 

I therefore can't understand how an elite athlete along the lines of Sharapova with a cadre of doctors, physiotherapists, publicists etc has allowed this to happen to her.  Surely the doctor(s) who prescribed this medication would have been aware of the WADA ruling in October 2015 (published in its entirety below) which indicated that this drug that he/she has been prescribing for Sharapova for the past 10 years was now on the list of prohibited substances. 

As most of you will by now have heard, Maria Sharapova announced today that she had failed a drug test at this year’s Australian Open.  She stated that for the past 10 years she had been taking the drug Meldonium, a drug used to treat patients with heart problems.  One of the benefits of this drug is increased endurance and so there are quite a few athletes (according to the internet) who take this drug as it was not a banned substance.  The same held true for Sharapova who indicated that she had been taking the drug on the advice of her doctors as she had a family history of heart disease and diabetes (we will not say anything further on the whole Sugarpova thing).

The Spin team like many of you are without a doubt shocked at this and the tennis community is for want of a better word beside itself in trying to explain how an athlete of the caliber of Sharapova could have found herself in this situation.   Ms. Sharapova has indictated that in December when the list of banned substances was published by WADA, neither she or any member of her team noticed the inclusion of Meldonium amongst the list of banned substances.  As a result she continued to take the drug and this led to her returning a positive test for the drug.

Apart from the shock that has accompanied this announcement there has been a certain amount of deifying of Sharapova with many players, media types, fans and commentators expressing the view that Sharapova being a hard worker for so long it is inconceivable that she willingly took a drug knowing that it was a banned substance.  My only wish is that the commentators listened attentively to Sharapova’s press conference as not only did she take responsibility for her actions, she is ready to accept the consequences of those actions.  It would do folks well to take a leaf from Sharapova's playbook.  

In looking up Meldonium and seeing its effects, one can’t help but talk about the endurance factor.  Many will recall that in 2013-2014 Sharapova was anointed the queen of 3 set matches as she would outlast opponents who were more fleet of foot and she did this on what used to be her worst surface.  It is instructive that her endurance, and stamina came about in 2006.  If you are a skeptic you will immediately say that she started to reap the benefits of the drug.  If you believe that the gains she made are attributable to hard work and dedication you would also not be wrong.  

However, while many will be wringing their hands and wondering what happens to Sharapova next, how about we pause for a minute and think about our sport.  Sharapova is without a doubt one of the biggest names in tennis.  Every month we are bombarded with information from her uber agent, Max Eisenbud in which he tells us that his client is the highest earning female athlete.  

The urge to deify Sharapova by many has made folks miss the point in all of this.  The sport, just not long out of the headlines concerning match fixing has now found its way into the consciousness of many persons, some not even affiliated with tennis, by having one of its biggest stars test positive for a doping violation.  However, to read the tweets from persons who should know better has me wondering which is more important, the so called stars of the sport or the sport itself.

As more and more information is revealed by journalists and tennis fans alike, the excuse that Sharapova unwittingly took a drug that she did not know was banned becomes murky.  

Below is an article that was circulated by WADA and dated 22 October 2015.  I am reprinting the article in its entirety in order not to misquote any part of it.  It would seem as if this particular drug had been in WADA’s radar for quite sometime and the release below indicates that this was sent out worldwide so that all athletes and their partners could become aware of it.

Thursday, October 22, 2015
October 22, 2015
Michael Pearlmutter
Partnership for Clean Competition
Executive Director
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. – When the 2016 WADA Prohibited List of performance enhancing substances and methods was released earlier this month, mildronate (meldonium) was a notable new addition to the list. Earlier this year, a special research project funded, in part, by the Partnership for Clean Competition, was tasked with evaluating global athlete usage of mildronate, which was not previously prohibited, to determine if the rates of use indicated any potential performance-enhancing concerns. Analysis of 8,300 random, anonymous urine samples collected at doping control sessions revealed that 182 (2.2%) contained the energy-shifting drug mildronate, a substance first discovered and used in the 1980s as a cardioprotective agent. 

"From an anti-doping perspective, the 2.2% rate in this study was concerning," said Dr. Larry Bowers, Chairperson of the PCC Scientific Board, "This figure represents more than twice the overall rate of laboratory findings for a single drug than any of the substances on the Prohibited List."

While mildronate was not on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) Prohibited List at the time of the study, it was included in the WADA substance monitoring program in order to assess its prevalence and misuse in sport. The results of the special research project were provided to WADA as part of the monitoring program.

"This project shows both the impact of our work and the quality of the PCC funding process. A substance with this high a prevalence needs to be identified quickly through a flexible research funding process. Thankfully, we were able to respond to a potential situation within weeks and the results were known less than one month later," said Michael Pearlmutter, Executive Director of the PCC.

This special research project was conducted by five scientists led by Dr. Mario Thevis, who reviewed and tested thousands of urine samples stored at the WADA lab in Cologne, Germany in order to identify how many athletes may be using the substance for its potential performance-enhancing characteristics rather than its intended medical purpose. The study results showed that the use of mildronate was not limited to a particular sport or group of sports, but was found in a wide range of samples.

The results of this study suggested that further action was warranted to protect the rights of clean athletes around the world. The study concluded, "Due to the growing body of evidence (black market products and athletes' statements) concerning its misuse in sport, adequate test methods for the reliable identification of mildronate are required, especially since the substance has been added to the 2015 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) monitoring program."

By adding mildronate to the 2016 Prohibited List, WADA has taken the steps necessary to protect clean athletes and guard them against any competitors who may choose to cheat by misusing this substance.​

It surely cannot be the case that Sharapova with all the staff at her disposal, including uber agent, Max Eisenbud must have been aware of not only the dangers of this drug, but also the fact that it had now found its way to WADA’s list of banned substances?  If it is the case that no one on her team read the list of banned substances or showed it to her doctors, then heads should roll for this. 

However, while we are still wringing our hands and wondering what will happen to poor Sharapova, how about we spare a thought for those players who lost out to her at this year's Australian Open. I am sure that somewhere Hbino, Sasnovich, Davis and Bencic are wondering whether they have a cause of action against Sharapova.for denying them the opportunity to go further at this year's Australian Open. 

Finally, am I the only  person who thought on an occassion as solemn as announcing that you have failed a drug test that you take the opportunity to be critical of the hotel carpeting.  Am I also the only one who thinks that the ITF allowed Sharapova and her team to announce the failed drug test in a way that mitigates the damage to her image?  One has to wonder just how serious the ITF takes its anti-doping situation. As one would expect there is speculation as to whether Sharapova's withdrawal from this week's BNP Paribas Open was due to the failed drug test or due to the injury.  

The time has come for tennis and its governing bodies to seriously take stock of the sport.  In January during the year's first Major, news broke about match fixing allegations, which happened at the Grand Slam level.  The names of top players were called and there were denials, denials and more denials from tennis' governing bodies.  In addition, there have been allegations of cover ups of doping violations.  One only has to reference the Marin Cilic situation where he cited an imaginary injury as the reason for withdrawing from Wimbledon, only for the public to find out that he had been provisionally banned.  His defence was that his mother bought the wrong mediation. 

We also turn to Victor Troicki, another ATP player who was sanctioned for failing to give a blood test. His excuse was that he was allergic to needles.  He has been defended at every opportunity by the ATP World No. 1, Novak Djokovic.  At some point, tennis needs to take a look in the mirror if it wants to be taken seriously in terms of anti-doping. 

I am sure as the days and weeks go on, we will either have more about Sharapova's doping violation.  As far as I have read, it would seem that she could either get a 4 year ban, or a 2 year ban.  There is always the Court for Arbitration for Sport and she can no doubt appeal any ban that she may get. 

It is a dark day for the sport and for women's tennis in general.  One can only hope that the sport will recover at some point. 

Saturday, March 5, 2016


by Karen 

For whatever reason it has been a very confusing time for tennis fans.  On the one hand they cry out for players with personalities.  They have become bored by the niceties amongst players.  They describe friendships amongst players as fake.  There was even one player who basically said that the friendships being described on Tour are fake and that all WTA players hate each other. 

Many current WTA players dismissed these suggestions and one can only speculate that the doubles partnership of Garbine Muguruza and Carla Suarez-Navarro broke up as a result of Muguruza's comments about the lack of friendships on Tour. 

Whenever tennis players show their personalities it is usually met with outright anger by some tennis fans.  It gives tennis journalists something to write about.  After all, surely everyone gets tired of writing the same stories each and every day. Tennis players who show their personalities usually get the sport into  the mainstream consciousness.  Consider the case of Nicholas Kyrgios.  We all remember the dust up between Kyrgios and Wawrinka where Kyrgios informed Wawrinka that his girlfriend had slept with a fellow ATP player.  Apart from the fact that Kyrgios apparently broke the bro code, many in tennis media took the opportunity to out the girlfriend of Wawrinka (on the pretext of defending her, but we all knew what was up) and so tennis got its bad boy.  

Said bad boy struck again this morning with a number of tweets in which he castigated a tennis journalist as a result, I suspect of an article that said journalist wrote about Lleyton Hewitt.  I carry no brief for anyone in this kerfluffle.  What I do find interesting is that someone felt it was necessary in defending said journalist (someone who is quite capable of defending himself) by tweeting directly to Kyrgios and informing him that said journalist had slept with Kyrgios' girlfriend. I suspect that this was supposed to be an insult, but it gets me back to the whole situation of people defending alleged victims of slut shaming.  Kyrgios' girlfriend is a WTA Tour player.  It was said far and wide that Kyrgios used Wawrinka's girlfriend as a tool to insult Wawrinka.  I am now wondering what this tennis fan's intent was when she told Nick that the journalist was screwing/is screwing/had screwed his girlfriend?

In terms of personality, I have only seen Jelena Ostapenko's name on a draw sheet. An ITF stalwart, Ostapenko has not had many wins on the WTA Tour.  In February she made it to the final of the Qatar Open where she lost to Suarez-Navarro.  Before that I had heard of her because of her dust up with Naomi Broady. Fellow WTA players also took to Twitter to condemn Ostapenko for unsportsmanlike behaviour.  I have to say that during the week in Qatar I never saw one instance of Ostapenko's alleged unsportsmanlike conduct. She was competitive, fiery, disgusted with her play and she let us know.  Frankly, I have become a fan of hers since watching her play as she has the type of game style that I really like. I hope to see more of her and her personality. 

There are many players who do things on court that annoy me: I never liked the Petko dance. For one it lacked rhythm and I just did not like the idea of players dancing after winning matches.  I also hated the dab that Azarenka has adopted from the NFL. She looks ridiculous doing it.  I have become sick and tired of Radwanska's trick shots and I am sure there are many people out there who have become annoyed with the various issues that surround Petra Kvitova.  

The fact that these things irk me, I am sure irk many other tennis fans, however, we need to try and figure out what it is that we want from our tennis players. Are we looking to find friends who we can invite over for drinks or are we just seeking to be entertained because we love this sport.  If there is a player who annoys me I try to avoid watching their matches (Niculescu). If there is a player who I enjoy watching I will go all out to watch, warts and all. 

Tennis fans need to realise that tennis players are people too.  Stop trying to have cookie cutter players.  It is boring.  Appreciate the tennis.  If the tennis bores you, switch to another match or just turn off the tv.  Stop making the sport of tennis personal.  It is not.  These players don't know you and frankly I doubt if they care what we think about them (except for possibly Djokovic).

Appreciate the tennis.  Everything else usually sorts itself out.