The Oxford Concise Dictionary defines a mentor (n) as an
experienced and trusted adviser as in “he was her friend and mentor until
his death” or as “an
experienced person in a company or educational institution who trains and
counsels new employees or students” as in regular meetings between
mentor and trainee help guide young engineers through their early years.
In the situation of
Serena Williams and Sloane Stephens much has been made of the fact that Serena
mentored Sloane. If one follows the
definition of mentor above, Serena has not mentored Sloane. However, there are more ways in my view to
define who or what is a mentor.
I work in the legal
industry and I have been involved in mentorship programmes for about 4 years. These programmes are not designed to assist
young people to enter the legal industry, but they are designed to help young
people achieve their goals by keeping them focused on what is important,
namely:
1.
The importance of having a quality education;
2.
Assisting
them in establishing goals and helping them to achieve those goals;
3.
The
ability to listen and offer sound advice; and
4.
The
ability to never criticize or condemn anyone.
The above principles, while they may seem easy to look at
are very hard to achieve especially when you are dealing with teenagers.
When Serena Williams decided to play Fed Cup during the 2012
season, she not only made herself available to country, but she also made
herself available to the younger members of the US Fed Cup team. These young
women were able to be practice partners for one of the true legends of the
game. There were reports that seeing
Serena’s work ethic, the way she prepares for practice sessions and the way she
approached her matches gave insight to the younger players about how to deal
with expectations and pressure.
In some ways then you could say that Serena’s association
with not only Sloane, but with other members of the US Fed Cup team was that of
a mentor. How then does the media narrative seems to be that this mentoring
never happened, or that the friendship that ensued from playing Fed Cup is not
one of the reasons for Sloane’s improvements in her game and in her demeanour
and in fact, may have contributed to her win over Williams in their quarter-final
match at this year’s Australian Open?
When Ryan Harrison and Jack Sock became practice partners
for the great Andy Roddick, the media were quick to point out how much
influence Roddick had on these young American men. Both Harrison and Sock have gone to Roddick’s
home in Austin to have practice sessions with him and the media, as they are
wont to do, have indicated just how much of a mentoring process this is and
have played this up for all it is worth.
It was interesting reading through the various tweets from
noted journalists and bloggers who are now back stepping and basically saying
that there was never any mentorship of Sloane by Serena, and they have even
gone so far as to say that there is not much of a friendship there. As a matter of fact, comparisons are now
being made of Stephens’ demeanour and attitude to one Maria Sharapova. I mean you just cannot make this stuff up.
The Sharapova comparisons are even laughable in that because
after her win Stephens went to her phone to check messages, a la the same thing
Sharapova did after defeating Serena at Wimbeldon in 2004. I guess a phone
endorsement is coming soon to Stephens. Someone
should tell Sloane that it has been 9 years since Sharapova got a win over
Serena. I doubt if it will take Sloane 9
years to get another win, but it is probably not going to be good for her the
next time she meets Serena.
The media has even gone so far as to discount Madison Keys’
interest in tennis. Ever since I have
heard of Madison Keys, the story has always been that she wanted one of Venus’
dress that she saw her playing in, asked for the dress, and her parents
indicated that she would have to play tennis to get the dress. Whether Keys was inspired by Venus or by the
dress, we will never know because soon the story of the dress will also be
discounted.
Jennifer Capriati
After last night’s match, Capriati who makes it more in the
tabloids than she does in any way related to tennis, took to Twitter last night
to basically remind us all of why she is a bitter woman. One wonders how she ever got into the Hall of
Fame. One would think that neither Venus
or Serena have any plans to ever retire because they surely would not wish to be
included in a place that purportedly honours champions when the likes of Capriati
have been inducted.
Sexism in Tennis
When I first started this blog, it was to comment first of
all on the unfavourable comments that broadcasters made during women’s matches,
and it was only to bring to light the inequality when it came to featuring
women’s matches, especially at combined events.
There were many times over the past 4 years that this blog has been
around that I have become so disconsolate at the media and how they portray
women’s tennis.
Things have gotten a lot better since I started, but I still
hear instances of negativity and stereotyping when it comes to commentators and
how they deal with matches featuring women.
Most of the commentary is always centered around the mentality of the women
and their emotions, as if it is only women who are affected by their mental and
emotions and indeed their hormones when it comes to playing tennis.
In case there was any doubt, men do suffer from hormonal
issues as well. Men do have emotional
breakdowns during matches and men do find it hard to compete mentally when
things are not going their way. There is
a reason why 47% of men suffer from erectile dysfunction and 90% of the
sufferers are not old men on medication.
They are young men in the prime of their lives who are unable to deal
with the pressures of the modern world and the first thing that goes is their
ability to perform sexually.
That being said, reading through Tsonga’s take on why the
women are not as successful as the top 3 in men’s tennis seems to have missed
the bit of irony altogether.
In case he has not realized it, Tsonga has basically said
what those of us who have followed women’s tennis for years have known. The men are afraid to step outside their
comfort zones and take down the men at the top.
If they could, there is no reason in the world why 3 men and Andy Murray
should be dominating Masters Series events and the Grand Slams in the way that
they have done.
On the women’s tour many women have made the leap from
journeywoman to Grand Slam champion.
Since 2009 we have had 16 Grand Slams played, from this amount, here are
the winners:-
YEAR
|
GRAND SLAM
|
MEN
|
WOMEN
|
2009
|
AUSTRALIAN OPEN
|
NADAL
|
WILLIAMS
|
2009
|
FRENCH OPEN
|
FEDERER
|
KUZNETSOVA
|
2009
|
WIMBLEDON
|
FEDERER
|
WILLIAMS
|
2009
|
U.S. OPEN
|
DEL POTRO
|
CLIJSTERS
|
2010
|
AUSTRALIAN OPEN
|
FEDERER
|
WILLIAMS
|
2010
|
FRENCH OPEN
|
NADAL
|
SCHIAVONE
|
2010
|
WIMBLEDON
|
NADAL
|
WILLIAMS
|
2010
|
U.S. OPEN
|
NADAL
|
CLIJSTERS
|
2011
|
AUSTRALIAN OPEN
|
DJOKOVIC
|
CLIJSTERS
|
2011
|
FRENCH OPEN
|
NADAL
|
LI
|
2011
|
WIMBLEDON
|
DJOKOVIC
|
KVITOVA
|
2011
|
U.S. OPEN
|
DJOKOVIC
|
STOSUR
|
2012
|
AUSTRALIAN OPEN
|
DJOKOVIC
|
AZARENKA
|
2012
|
FRENCH OPEN
|
NADAL
|
SHARAPOVA
|
2012
|
WIMBLEDON
|
FEDERER
|
WILLIAMS
|
2012
|
U.S. OPEN
|
MURRAY
|
WILLIAMS
|
Apart from 2012 when Murray finally had his breakthrough
win, the last time a player outside of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic won a Grand
Slam was 2009 when Del Potro had his big win. Since that time the depth on the
women’s tour speaks to the variety, consistency and mental toughness.
I guess those hormonal women know something the men don’t.